Announcing the homecoming celebration of "Trial & Heirs"

Please join Andrew Mayoras and Danielle Mayoras at the homecoming celebration and book signing for the nationally acclaimed “Trial & Heirs:  Famous Fortune Fights!”, the new book that actually makes estate planning fun and interesting!  The event will take place at the Barnes & Noble in Troy, Michigan, on April 23, 2010, from 7 to 9 p.m. and is open to the public.   By Andrew W. Mayoras and Danielle B. Mayoras, co-authors of “Trial and Heirs: Famous Fortune Fights!” and husband-and-wife legacy expert attorneys. As educators across the United States through speaking engagements, print, broadcast, and social media, Danielle and Andrew consistently draw rave reviews and are in high demand. Email them at  contact@trialandheirs.com .

Read more here:
Announcing the homecoming celebration of "Trial & Heirs"

Farrah Fawcett trust in the midst of ugly lawsuit

Richard Francis is the trustee of The Fawcett Living Trust, Farrah Fawcett’s trust which details how she wanted her money to pass.  You can read the Probate Lawyer Blog’s prior article discussing this interesting trust here .  On behalf of the trust, Francis sued Hollywood producer Craig Nevius accusing him of embezzling hundreds of thousands of dollars from Fawcett’s company and botching production of a television documentary showing her struggles with cancer. Nevius is not taking the lawsuit lying down.  In fact, he says the entire case is a thinly-disguised attempt by Francis to use money from Fawcett’s trust to protect his own interests.  Nevius had already sued Nevius, as well as Ryan O’Neal (Fawcett’s longtime companion) and her friend Alana Stewart when Nevius felt they wrongly excluded him from producing the documentary, which aired on NBC in May of 2009.  In other words, Nevius says that this lawsuit by Francis is retaliation to get back at him for his lawsuit. But, that’s just the beginning of the fireworks.  Nevius claimed that he was a close friend of Fawcett and one of the first she told when she found out she had cancer in September, 2006.  He alleges that Stewart (whom he describes as “Ms. Fawcett’s self-proclaimed ‘best friend’”) only found out about her cancer from the internet, weeks later.  Nevius states that Stewart was absent from Fawcett’s life “when there were no video cameras present”.  Stewart, Nevius says, weaseled her way into the documentary so she could profit from it — and she published a book to make even more money off of Fawcett by divulging her private medical information. But that pales in comparison to what Nevius says Ryan O’Neal and Richard Francis did.  O’Neal, Nevius’ court papers say, actually threatened to kill Nevius to get him to surrender control of the documentary.  Francis, whom Nevius describes as O’Neal’s business manager, later told Nevius to stay away from Fawcett or “you’re gonna get your ass kicked in by Ryan!  And I mean it!”. Nevius says he only wanted to protect Fawcett and make sure her needs were being met.  But O’Neal and Francis conspired to wrest control of the documentary away from Nevius and lock him out of Fawcett’s life. Nevius also expresses his outrage that the documentary included footage of Fawcett on her death bed and being visited by her son in “a prison jumpsuit and chains”, which he claims Fawcett never wanted to be shown.  Nevius also objects to Stewart and O’Neal both using the documentary to make self-serving statements to benefit themselves. Nevius says the whole lawsuit is an excuse by Francis to line his pockets and those of his attorneys, at the expense of the trust beneficiaries, including Fawcett’s father, who have not received the money they’re supposed to from the trust. Courtesy of Radaronline, you can read Nevius’ court filing here .  The lawyer representing Francis, O’Neal and Stewart has already responded, calling Nevius’ allegations “spurious and outrageous”. So what can you make from all this?  Well, clearly, someone tried to exploit Farrah Fawcett while she was dying from cancer.  Was it Nevius, by allegedly embezzling hundreds of thousands of dollars from her?  Or was it the trio of Francis, O’Neal and Stewart?  We don’t know which side is telling the truth.  We do know that it’s obviously gotten very ugly. But the real tragedy is that cases of exploitation of the sick and the elderly is far more common that most people realize.  Many see those with cancer or other diseases, or mental deficits caused by dementia and/or Alzheimer’s, to be a golden opportunity to get close, cut out others, and end up with the money. It doesn’t just happen to the wealthy, either.  Think someone mentally limited with $100,000 in assets isn’t a target for someone desperate for “easy money?”  They are.  And lawsuits where two sides, both claiming to love someone, duke it out in court over his or her true wishes are a growing epidemic. So talk to your loved ones.  Do the proper planning ahead of time.  Protect them and be wary. Many of our clients  say they never could have imagined it happening to their family.  Fawcett’s loved ones are probably saying the same thing. By Andrew W. Mayoras and Danielle B. Mayoras, co-authors of “Trial and Heirs: Famous Fortune Fights!” and husband-and-wife legacy expert attorneys. As educators across the United States through speaking engagements, print, broadcast, and social media, Danielle and Andrew consistently draw rave reviews and are in high demand. Email them at  contact@trialandheirs.com .

Read more here:
Farrah Fawcett trust in the midst of ugly lawsuit

Will contest rages over estate of illustrator Tasha Tudor

Tasha Tudor was a beloved children’s book illustrator and author who was considered by many to be a 19-century Martha Stewart.  She lived as if it was the 1800s, on a New England farm.  She even raised her four children for years without electricity or running water.  She illustrated such classics as The Wind in the Willows, The Night Before Christmas, and The Secret Garden. Tudor died at the age of 92 on June 18, 2008, eccentric to the end.  According to the New York Times, she claimed to be the reincarnation of a sea captain’s wife who lived in the early 19th Century and she strove to replicate that life.  Tudor said that, after she passed, she intended to return to the 1830s.  Her estate has been estimated to be worth more that two million dollars.  She left almost all of it to only one of her four children. The will was reportedly signed in 2001 and left everything to her son Seth, and his son Winslow, except for small bequests to the other three children and some of the grandchildren.  Tudor’s will says that she didn’t leave more to her other children because they were estranged. The attack on the will is led by her other son, Thomas Tudor, who says he was never estranged from his mother.  He and his two sisters claim that Seth exercised undue influence to convince their mother to sign that will.  They’ve also claimed that Seth isn’t properly administering the estate, challenging his decision to allow a public memorial service when the will called for no funeral or viewing. The judge appointed a special administrator to handle the estate’s taxes and help determine what the estate is really worth.  In doing so, he noted how he felt it was impossible for the family to ever agree. The Boston Globe has the full story on the case here . As attorneys who regularly handle and educate about estate and trust disputes like this one, we can say that these are always emotional and difficult for everyone involved.  It sounds like the Tudor family feud will be no exception.  That’s one of the reasons we wrote “ Trial & Heirs:  Famous Fortune Fights !”  We use celebrity tales like this one to help families from ending up the same way.  We also include chapters about what families should do if they’re already in a will contest or other family court fight. By Andrew W. Mayoras and Danielle B. Mayoras, co-authors of “Trial and Heirs: Famous Fortune Fights!” and husband-and-wife legacy expert attorneys. As educators across the United States through speaking engagements, print, broadcast, and social media, Danielle and Andrew consistently draw rave reviews and are in high demand. Email them at  contact@trialandheirs.com .

Read more here:
Will contest rages over estate of illustrator Tasha Tudor

Michael Jackson Estate’s record deal raises questions

The Probate Lawyer Blog featured this article about the Michael Jackson Estate several weeks ago, posing the question of whether it is ethical for estate executors to seek a 10% fee for certain business deals they reach for such a high-profile estate.  It’s especially problematic when you factor in that one of the executors was Michael Jackson’s attorney. Well, this attorney, John Branca, and his co-executor, John McClain (a music executive), just hit the mother-load.  It was widely reported yesterday that they brokered a deal worth up to $250 million dollars (that’s right — one quarter of a billion dollars!).   What was the deal for?  Sony announced a seven-year distribution agreement for unreleased music recorded by the late King of Pop (as well as related video footage).  Yes that means that Branca and McClain earned $12.5 million each for one deal. Why do we question this?  For several reasons, actually.  First, it’s the job of executors to bring in as much money as possible for an estate that has earning potential like this estate has.  They shouldn’t need a 10% incentive to do the job they’re required by law to do. Second, Branca, reportedly, is the attorney who prepared the will and trust that named him as the co-executor and co-trustee.  Because of these documents that he created, he just made $12.5 million — in addition to the other fees he’s already earned (and will continue to earn). Would it be ethical for an attorney to create a will for a client to sign that leaves $12.5 million to that attorney as a direct beneficiary?  In most cases, no, it wouldn’t.  So why is this attorney allowed to earn that much as an executor fee? Finally, there’s the issue which we discuss in our book, “ Trial & Heirs:  Famous Fortune Fights !”, that Michael Jackson’s Trust wasn’t funded properly.  If it had been, then his estate would have been kept out of court and handled in private.  It’s also entirely possible that his trust document (which hasn’t been released to the public) may have specified what compensation the trustees would have received.  IF that’s the case (just speculating here), then Branca and McClain wouldn’t necessarily have been able to receive this percentage fee.  But, because Jackson’s Trust wasn’t properly funded, thereby requiring it to pass through the probate court process, it opened the door to allow this type of fee to be approved by the judge (again, if the trust document addressed their compensation, which isn’t unusual).  And the judge did approve the executors’ 10% fee in this case. A properly-used estate plan would have bypassed court entirely.  Jackson’s estate plan didn’t do that.  The attorney who prepared that estate plan now just earned tens of millions of dollars because of that estate plan.  And it’s all legal.  But is it ethical? Some feel it is.  After all, Branca is a respected entertainment lawyer and McClain is an experienced music executive.  They have the expertise to broker deals like this.  And clearly, judging by the amount of money they’ve brought into the estate, they’re good at what they do.  And Michael Jackson’s heirs are benefiting from their expertise. If it’s standard to compensate entertainment industry experts with this type of fee, why shouldn’t Branca and McClain earn what may be considered fair compensation in that line of business?  There is some merit to this position.  After all, Michael’s mother, Katherine Jackson, spent months battling McClain and Branca in court over this estate (until she hired a new attorney, at which time she changed her position).  Yet she didn’t object to their 10% fee.  If a primary beneficiary of Michael’s estate didn’t object to this generous fee, why should anyone else? What do you think? Posted by:  Andrew W. Mayoras & Danielle B. Mayoras, co-authors of Trial & Heirs :  Famous Fortune Fights! and co-founders of  The Center for Probate Litigation and  The Center for Elder Law  in metro-Detroit, Michigan, which concentrate in probate litigation, estate planning, and elder law.  Andrew & Danielle are husband and wife attorneys, professional speakers and consultants across the country.

Read more here:
Michael Jackson Estate’s record deal raises questions

The Elvis Presley Conspiracy (Part III): Eliza’s journey

I know, this all sounds crazy.

The Redd Foxx Estate mess

There was an interesting article recently in AOL News about the Redd Foxx Estate.  The successful comedian and star of Sanford and Son (whose real name was John Elroy Sanford) died October 11, 1991.  Apparently, the Estate has no assets.  Even if it did, there’s an outstanding tax bill owed that’s a bit hefty — a whopping $3.6 million as of the day he died. But the court-appointed executor for the estate is trying to change all that.  John Cahill, who is a public administrator in Las Vegas (where the estate is pending) was put in charge in 2007.  The prior administrator was Debraca Foxx, Foxx’s daughter, who was removed from her position in 2006.  Apparently, she failed to comply with a court order to account for what she had done with royalties and other monies the estate brought in under her watch. In fact, Foxx’s widow (and fourth wife), Ka Ho Foxx, accused Debraca of stealing the money instead of paying down the tax debt. Since Cahill took over, he has aggressively pursued revenue for the estate and has brought in more than $100,000 since 2007, including royalty checks from Hallmark and CBS Studios for using Foxx’s image. But now, Cahill is trying to sell the rights to Foxx’s life story to bring in some real cash for the estate.  He says he’s received offers for various amounts, up to $2 million, for the story rights.  He’s recently “done lunch” with a Hollywood producer and TV star about the project. But, there are a few hurdles to clear.  The first is that, while the estate does own the right to profit from Foxx’s name, image and likeness, it’s far from clear that the estate has the same rights for a “life story”.  That’s why you see “unauthorized” biographies and documentaries about famous people all the time. But Cahill says his attorney feels otherwise and he is legally permitted to sell the story rights of behalf of the estate. The second problem is that Foxx’s widow plans to fight Cahill in court.  Apparently she and other Foxx heirs don’t want this to happen.  And why would they, with all the money due to the IRS anyway? You can read the AOL article here . We’ll have to see if Cahill’s efforts are successful.  Managing estates is never easy, especially when the first person in charge wasn’t forth coming with what was done with the money.  People often don’t stop to think about the headaches that can occur in probate court when someone dies. That’s why is always important for everyone to do the proper estate planning, including choosing someone who is trustworthy and dependable to handle the difficult job of trust or estate administration.  Even without a big tax bill or complicated issues like publicity rights to worry about, probate court is never a walk in the park. By Andrew W. Mayoras and Danielle B. Mayoras, co-authors of “Trial & Heirs: Famous Fortune Fights!” and husband-and-wife legacy expert attorneys.  As educators across the United States through speaking engagements, print, broadcast, and social media, Danielle and Andrew consistently draw rave reviews and are in high demand.   Email them at contact@trialandheirs.com .

Read more here:
The Redd Foxx Estate mess

Brittany Murphy did update her estate plan, after all

Actress

The Elvis Presley Conspiracy (Part II): The Background

After Eliza Presley shared her DNA evidence with me, as well as the story about how she got it, I spent some time digging around to see what else was out there to corroborate or contradict her story.  Eliza’s claim is that she’s the daughter of Vernon Presley, the father of Elvis.  But she bases her claim, in part, on evidence from a man who Eliza believes actually IS Elvis Presley, still alive.  Eliza says she never suspected Elvis might be alive when she began her journey. Rather, according to Eliza, she only wanted to find out who her father was.  Eliza was 13 when she learned that she was adopted as a baby.  Several years later, Eliza met her birth mother, who gave Eliza the name of a man who was supposedly her father.  But when Eliza contacted him, he was adamant he wasn’t her father and didn’t even know her mother in 1961.  Eliza had to look elsewhere.  Later in life, she and her husband at the time had been shocked, when seeing pictures of Elvis as a young child, how much he looked like their three-year-old son, Andrew.  Eliza knew that her birth mother had lived across the street from Elvis at Graceland when he bought it in 1957-58 and had been friends with his family [see picture of Elvis and Eliza's birth mother and aunt].  Eliza’s husband even suggested that Elvis may have been the father, because she shared a family resemblance … not to mention the fact that Eliza was the only one of four children given up for adoption.  So Eliza had wondered for some time if she could be the daughter of Elvis.  But she never bought into the whole “Elvis is alive” movement when she started her search. People who believe that Elvis did not die on August 16, 1977 like to point to a book published in 2001 and written by a board-certified psychiatrist named Dr. Donald Hinton.  He wrote it with a mysterious co-author named “Jesse.”  Dr. Hinton claimed Jesse was actually Elvis, having faked his death with the help of his manger, Colonel Tom Parker.  Jesse, by the way, was the name of Elvis’ identical twin brother who was stillborn. According to Dr. Hinton, Jesse had to get away from the life of Elvis for several reasons, primarily because of his poor health and due to threats against him and his family.  Col. Parker agreed to help because he could earn lots of money from doing so, Dr. Hinton said.  Indeed, Elvis has been at or near the top of Forbes’ list of the highest earning dead celebrities for years. Dr. Hinton said he treated Jesse for nearly six years for pain management due to his arthritic condition and other medical problems.  He claimed that Jesse opened up to him and told him of his true identity.  His book included many handwritten letters by Jesse and said it was Jesse’s way of re-introducing himself to the world. There were a few problems with Dr. Hinton’s story.  One was that he promised in the book that Elvis/Jesse would reveal himself to the world in 2002.  Obviously, that never happened.  Another was that the book led to an investigations of Dr. Hinton for mail fraud, by the Missouri Attorney General’s office, as well as by the DEA and Missouri Healing Arts Board for illegally prescribing medications to Jesse.  Dr. Hinton actually lost his ability to prescribe medicine and was placed on 5 months probation by the medical board. But the Dr. Hinton investigation did lead to an interesting place.  When Dr. Hinton came under attack, his patient, Jesse, wrote a letter to the Attorney General supporting Dr. Hinton and refuting the mail fraud claims.  He included the following in his letter:  Sir, I don’t know if you believe in my continued existence or not, but if I continue to expose myself like I did in the book, I will be eliminated very easily.  Pure and simple as that. The Attorney General’s office had the letter analyzed by a special type of handwriting expert, Shirley Mason, who was a certified graphologist.  Graphology is commonly used by the FBI and throughout Europe, but is not universally accepted.  Mason worked for the Kansas City Bureau of Investigations for many years, successfully using graphology as evidence in criminal court cases.  Shirley Mason reported that she compared the Jesse letter to past letters written by Elvis.  So what did she have to say about it? Not only did they match, Mason wrote, but she would testify in court, under oath, that Elvis “ has to be ALIVE.”  She felt the handwriting was “UNMISTAKABLE”.  The attorney general’s office cleared Dr. Hinton of all charges. Here’s a website by Linda Hood-Sigmon , who is a friend of Jesse, showing copies of the Jesse letter and the Mason report.  Hood-Sigmon is one of the biggest proponents of the “Elvis is alive” theory and has a great deal of evidence on her website.  She points to this picture of Jesse and says it was taken on a visit to Lisa Marie Presley so he could see his grandchildren.  She states that the controversial photograph marks the first time Jesse met his grandson, Benjamin Storm, in 1994.  But Hood-Sigmon and others who say Elvis is alive do have many vocal critics.  Here’s an example of a recent article written by one who tries to debunk some of the evidence that Elvis didn’t really die.  But, he doesn’t address any DNA evidence in his article or the Mason report.  Instead, he summarily concludes that “one side has no facts and no evidence” and as such, there shouldn’t even be a debate. Others see it differently.  In fact, because of Dr. Hinton’s book, a  television reporter in Cleveland, Suzanne Stratford, began investigating. She interviewed Dr. Hinton on camera and analyzed the evidence, including the Mason report, a picture taken 6 months after the funeral of what looked like Elvis peering through a screen door (and certified by Kodak), and the fact Elvis’ tombstone lists his middle name as “Aaron” when official records show his true middle name to be “Aron”.  [See the pictures below on this point].  Stratford also reported that Dr. Hinton had passed a lie detector test they had administered. And there’s more.  Stratford reported she was contacted by Jesse.  She asked for, and received, a sample of Jesse’s DNA, in 2002, so it could be tested.  FOX 8 News did in fact test the DNA sample against known “control” samples of Elvis, including a 1975 liver biopsy sample and tissue from his autopsy.  The problem was that they didn’t match. But again, another interesting turn.  Not only did the “Jesse” sample not match the other two samples, but they didn’t match each other.  In other words, Elvis’ autopsy tissue did not match the liver tissue from 1975.  So where did the autopsy sample come from?  Does this mean that Elvis’ autopsy was faked?  Maybe.  Stratford also interviewed cousins of Elvis who said that the body at the funeral looked like it was made out of wax, rather than being real. But, of course, there’s only one person alive (other than Jesse, of course) who can definitively prove or disprove that Jesse is Elvis … Elvis’ daughter.  FOX 8 News contacted Lisa Marie Presley’s representatives and asked for a sample of her DNA to find out the truth.  She declined. The FOX 8 News video stories are available on YouTube.  Here’s the one  from 2008 that summarizes all of Stratford’s investigation up until the Eliza Presley case.  Her previous investigation stalled in 2004, until Eliza Presley contacted her 2008.  Apparently, an Elvis collector, David Collins, repeatedly told Eliza to get in touch with Stratford when Eliza had contacted him as part of her search to learn if Elvis was her father. At first, Eliza didn’t contact Stratford, still thinking that Elvis couldn’t actually be alive.  But, then she did reach out to Stratford, hoping to test her DNA against other Elvis sample
s FOX 8 News had. In 2008 S
tratford interviewed Eliza Presley as part of her ongoing investigation.  FOX 8 News sent the 2002 sample it had received from Jesse to a lab so that it could be tested against Eliza’s DNA evidence. And the results were . . .  (To be continued . . . ) [This is the second of a four-part series covering the Eliza Presley case.] By Andrew W. Mayoras and Danielle B. Mayoras, co-authors of “Trial & Heirs: Famous Fortune Fights!” and husband-and-wife legacy expert attorneys. As educators across the United States through speaking engagements, print, broadcast, and social media, Danielle and Andrew consistently draw rave reviews and are in high demand. Email them at contact @ trialandheirs.com.

Read more here:
The Elvis Presley Conspiracy (Part II): The Background

Motion Magazine book review of Trial & Heirs

Review of “Trial & Heirs:  Famous Fortune Fights!” by Motion Magazine, part of LegalNews.com: Anna Nicole Smith, Ray Charles, Heath Ledger, Michael Jackson, Supreme Court Justice Warren Burger …  what do they all have in common? They were all celebrities, they’re no longer among the living, and they all can teach us a lesson. At least according to husband and wife legacy expert attorneys Andrew W. Mayoras and Danielle B. Mayoras, authors of “Trial & Heirs: Famous Fortune Fights!” The book dishes out drama using celebrity cases to highlight the importance of proper estate planning. The Mayorases compiled and researched these high-profile celebrity cases with Danielle, who specializes in estate planning education, taking on the title of “Queen of Heirs” while Andrew used his probate litigation experience as “King of Trials.” Satisfying readers’ voyeuristic side with the engaging stories of celebrity heir in-fighting isn’t the book’s only draw. Featured on The Rachael Ray Show, WGN Chicago, and Forbes.com, “Trial & Heirs” can be utilized by those seeking to spark the dreaded family discussion about planning for a loved one’s passing. “We have tips to avoid family fights and we have ideas to spark family discussion,” Danielle says of the book. “So not only is it a good tool for the general public, but the goal was to give professionals a vehicle to start conversations with their clients…they can talk about Princess Di and Frank Sinatra and Jimi Hendrix…really start the conversation.” And while the book provides readers with titillating true tales of celebrity courtroom cattiness at its very best, it also details how problems can be avoided. In addition, definitions of legal terminology commonly used in estate planning are placed strategically throughout the book. “I think there’s a sensationalism in our culture where there’s this celebrity stardom everybody wants to read about,” Danielle says.“We wanted to take that sensationalistic or tabloid aspect to kind of fool people. They might be reading it for the tabloid aspect but they don’t realize initially that they’re getting taught and they’re learning.” But what can these celebrity stories teach the everyday person? “Celebrities’ families are fighting about the same issues,” Andrew points out. “My clients fight about the exact same issues that are in the book. “Simple common mistakes the celebrities make are the same mistakes we see everyday people making,” he adds. “Different dollar figures, but the concepts apply to everybody.” The response to “Trial & Heirs,” which came out in November, has been amazing, according to the authors. “We’ve had attorneys from around the country contact us and say, ‘I want to buy these in bulk and provide them to my clients,’” Danielle explains. “It’s a great tool for attorneys to be able to turn over – especially if they have a stubborn client and maybe the client has a situation like one of the celebrities in the book – to say, ‘By the way, take a look at this case.’” According to Andrew, “One of the principal themes we keep saying in the book is ‘Don’t do it yourself…You need a good attorney.’ “The book has tips to find a good attorney and things to talk about with your attorney,” he says. “It’s really a call to action for people to find and work with a good attorney because too many people try to do it themselves and that’s what leads to a lot of the celebrity mishaps that we cover in the book.” Tabloid stories and their juicy details aside, the book provides insight into the oftentimes taboo world of estate planning. “It’s a way to get people to open their eyes and think about these things and have family discussions,” Andrew says. “A lot of these family fights can be prevented if people are proactive and they can avoid a lot of the heartache.” By Christine L. Mobley You can read the article here.   By Andrew W. Mayoras and Danielle B. Mayoras, co-authors of “Trial & Heirs: Famous Fortune Fights!” and husband-and-wife legacy expert attorneys. As educators across the United States through speaking engagements, print, broadcast, and social media, Danielle and Andrew consistently draw rave reviews and are in high demand. Email them at contact @ trialandheirs.com.

Read more here:
Motion Magazine book review of Trial & Heirs

The Elvis Presley Conspiracy (Part I): Is Elvis Alive?

One of my favorite lines from the movie Men in Black was: Agent Jay (Will Smith):  You do know that Elvis is dead, right?   Agent Kay (Tommie Lee Jones):  No, Elvis is not dead.  He just went home. That line has been running through my mind an awful lot lately. It all began in the early days of the Probate Lawyer Blog, when I came across a Memphis newspaper story about a woman claiming that she was the secret half-sister of Elvis and that she had the DNA to prove it.  How did she get the DNA?  From Elvis, because he was alive.  She had sued to re-open the Estate of Vernon Presley (Elvis’ father) to prove that Vernon was her father. And, of course, in  my first article about the case, I didn’t take her very seriously.  Elvis is alive?  Yeah, right.  Like almost everyone who heard about it, I scoffed.  I snickered.  I went about my day. Fast forward a few months … I received an email from the alleged half-sister, Eliza Presley.  She directed me to a website that had a lot of information explaining her DNA evidence.  I emailed back and asked Eliza for a copy of the DNA reports, so I could see them for myself.  Eliza politely said she was unable to send them to me because of the ongoing court case. But, I had seen enough that I thought I may as well keep an open mind.  Hey, stranger things have happened, right?  Here’s my second article about the case, where I said I was rooting for Eliza.  I mean, how cool would it be if she was right, and Elvis really was alive? The feedback I received from that article was surprising.  Many people contacted me because of it.  Most of them were very supportive of Eliza and proclaimed that the truth would come out … and it would shock the world.  I also received a few anti-Eliza emails, as well as a couple of phone calls, from people who vehemently (and quite aggressively) swore that Eliza was a big fraud and destined to land in jail.  In the meantime, Eliza Presley contacted me again.  I’ve interviewed her by phone, at length, along with her forensic investigator that helped her track down evidence for her case, as well as her attorney.  Her lawsuit is indeed proceeding, although slower than they’d like it to for a number of reasons.  Getting the Estate of Vernon Presley reopened was the first step.  That alone was a big accomplishment, because no Presley Estate had ever been reopened, despite the number of people claiming to be related to Elvis.  And it now appears that the court case will be coming to a head in the near future. Throughout these interviews, I’ve found Eliza to be very open and honest with me.  And yes, she even agreed to share a copy of the DNA reports with me.   She said that she chose to share them with me because, as an independent attorney experienced in estate disputes, as well as being an author and blogger in this legal area, I could write about the reports in an objective fashion.  I agreed to do so, but only on the condition that whatever opinions I wrote about the reports would be my own, whether Eliza agreed with them or not.  Eliza was comfortable with that. And so, she sent me the DNA reports.  I have read and analyzed the DNA reports and other evidence she sent me, as well as a lot of other information about the great ”Elvis Conspiracy” that I found on-line. And, I have to say, the information has been nothing short of fascinating.  So, do I believe Eliza?  Do I really think that Elvis is alive?  Is he really her half-brother? To be continued . . . [This is the first of a three-part series covering the Eliza Presley case.] Posted by:  Author and probate attorney Andrew W. Mayoras, co-author of Trial & Heir s :  Famous Fortune Fights!  and co-founder and shareholder of  The Center for Probate Litigation and  The Center for Elder Law   in metro-Detroit, Michigan, which concentrate in probate litigation, estate planning, and elder law.  You can email him at awmayoras @ brmmlaw.com.

Read more here:
The Elvis Presley Conspiracy (Part I): Is Elvis Alive?

Powered by WishList Member - Membership Software